linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix return code and improve feature check for synthetic uevents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181205163044.GB7185@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:30:44 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@...hat.com>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, jeyu@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        msekleta@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix return code and improve feature check for
 synthetic uevents

On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> Two small patches to aid handling of synthetic uevents back in userspace:
> 
>   - Return error code back to userspace on /sys/.../uevent file write
>     failure so userspace knows and it can act accordingly.
> 
>   - Add new 'kernel/uevent_features' sysfs file to make it possible for
>     userspace to check that the extended synthetic uevent arguments are
>     supported without relying on kernel version check only.
> 
> Peter Rajnoha (2):
>   kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails
>   kobject: add kernel/uevent_features sysfs file

Did you send this series twice?  Which one should I pay attention to?

confused,

greg k-h