[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2ca5544-55d2-10d4-cc6e-a3554c84b341@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:40:38 +0100
From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, jeyu@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
msekleta@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix return code and improve feature check for
synthetic uevents
Dňa 5. 12. 2018 o 17:30 Greg KH napísal(a):
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
>> Two small patches to aid handling of synthetic uevents back in userspace:
>>
>> - Return error code back to userspace on /sys/.../uevent file write
>> failure so userspace knows and it can act accordingly.
>>
>> - Add new 'kernel/uevent_features' sysfs file to make it possible for
>> userspace to check that the extended synthetic uevent arguments are
>> supported without relying on kernel version check only.
>>
>> Peter Rajnoha (2):
>> kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails
>> kobject: add kernel/uevent_features sysfs file
>
> Did you send this series twice? Which one should I pay attention to?
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
>
They're same, I just sent it again because I forgot to add the LKML list
with the first one. So please take the latter one with that list on CC.
Sorry for the confusion.
--
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists