linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6c6f238-0d5e-e47c-caf7-7e45bd1327dc@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:37:29 +0530
From:   Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        collinsd@...eaurora.org, mka@...omium.org, robh@...nel.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add rpmh powercontroller node



On 12/5/2018 4:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2018-12-03 21:21:18)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index b72bdb0a31a5..a6d0cd8d17b0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -1324,6 +1325,56 @@
>>                                  compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk";
>>                                  #clock-cells = <1>;
>>                          };
>> +
>> +                       rpmhpd: power-controller {
>> +                               compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd";
>> +                               #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> +                               operating-points-v2 = <&rpmhpd_opp_table>;
>> +                       };
>> +
>> +                       rpmhpd_opp_table: opp-table {
> 
> This table should go somewhere else? I don't understand why it's in the
> rpmh node because it's not an rpmh device. Does it go to the root? Or
> does it go under rpmhpd itself? I'm not sure.

I could move it to root perhaps, we seem to do that atleast in the case of
GPU. The power domain bindings (Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt)
seem to suggest it can't be under the power-controller node itself.