[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812070012350.3743@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 00:12:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] genirq: Export irq_chip_set_wake_parent()
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 05/12/2018 21:31, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:03 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >>
> >> Interrupt controllers in a hierarchy want to use this function to
> >> propogate ->irq_set_wake() operations to their parent domains.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> > Tglx/Marc: is this change OK? (ACK?)
>
> It looks OK to me, as it is consistent with irq_chip_set_type_parent,
> among others.
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
No objections either:
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists