linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] genirq: Export irq_chip_set_wake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd55816a-68da-c7d3-5dc7-bfe0b27c2ad2@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:55:49 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] genirq: Export irq_chip_set_wake_parent()

On 05/12/2018 21:31, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 6:03 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>>
>> Interrupt controllers in a hierarchy want to use this function to
>> propogate ->irq_set_wake() operations to their parent domains.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> 
> Tglx/Marc: is this change OK? (ACK?)

It looks OK to me, as it is consistent with irq_chip_set_type_parent,
among others.

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...