lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 09:08:42 -0700
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: smd: Add support for MSM8998 rpm clocks

On 12/7/2018 8:10 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 12/7/2018 3:30 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> On 06/12/2018 23:11, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>>
>>> Add rpm smd clocks, PMIC and bus clocks which are required on MSM8998
>>> for clients to vote on.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> v2
>>> -fix compatible ordering nits per Stephen
>>>
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt       |  1 +
>>>   drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c                     | 62 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h             |  6 +++
>>>   3 files changed, 69 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
>>> index 87b4949..944719b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Required properties :
>>>               "qcom,rpmcc-msm8974", "qcom,rpmcc"
>>>               "qcom,rpmcc-apq8064", "qcom,rpmcc"
>>>               "qcom,rpmcc-msm8996", "qcom,rpmcc"
>>> +            "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", "qcom,rpmcc"
>>>               "qcom,rpmcc-qcs404", "qcom,rpmcc"
>>>   - #clock-cells : shall contain 1
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c 
>>> b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>> index d3aadae..b1f95a9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>>> @@ -655,10 +655,72 @@ static int clk_smd_rpm_enable_scaling(struct 
>>> qcom_smd_rpm *rpm)
>>>       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(qcs404_clks),
>>>   };
>>> +/* msm8998 */
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, 
>>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, 
>>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 
>>> 0);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, div_clk1, div_clk1_a, 0xb);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, ipa_clk, ipa_a_clk, 
>>> QCOM_SMD_RPM_IPA_CLK, 0);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, bb_clk1, bb_clk1_a, 1);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, bb_clk2, bb_clk2_a, 2);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, bb_clk3_pin, 
>>> bb_clk3_a_pin, 3);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, mmssnoc_axi_rpm_clk, mmssnoc_axi_rpm_a_clk,
>>> +           QCOM_SMD_RPM_MMAXI_CLK, 0);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, aggre1_noc_clk, aggre1_noc_a_clk,
>>> +           QCOM_SMD_RPM_AGGR_CLK, 1);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, aggre2_noc_clk, aggre2_noc_a_clk,
>>> +           QCOM_SMD_RPM_AGGR_CLK, 2);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_QDSS(msm8998, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk,
>>> +            QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, rf_clk1, rf_clk1_a, 4);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, rf_clk2_pin, 
>>> rf_clk2_a_pin, 5);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_a, 6);
>>> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, rf_clk3_pin, 
>>> rf_clk3_a_pin, 6);
>>> +static struct clk_smd_rpm *msm8998_clks[] = {
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &msm8998_snoc_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &msm8998_snoc_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &msm8998_cnoc_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &msm8998_cnoc_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_CE1_CLK] = &msm8998_ce1_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_CE1_A_CLK] = &msm8998_ce1_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_DIV_CLK1] = &msm8998_div_clk1,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_DIV_A_CLK1] = &msm8998_div_clk1_a,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_IPA_CLK] = &msm8998_ipa_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_IPA_A_CLK] = &msm8998_ipa_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1] = &msm8998_bb_clk1,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1_A] = &msm8998_bb_clk1_a,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK2] = &msm8998_bb_clk2,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK2_A] = &msm8998_bb_clk2_a,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK3_PIN] = &msm8998_bb_clk3_pin,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK3_A_PIN] = &msm8998_bb_clk3_a_pin,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_MMAXI_CLK] = &msm8998_mmssnoc_axi_rpm_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_MMAXI_A_CLK] = &msm8998_mmssnoc_axi_rpm_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_AGGR1_NOC_CLK] = &msm8998_aggre1_noc_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_AGGR1_NOC_A_CLK] = &msm8998_aggre1_noc_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK] = &msm8998_aggre2_noc_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_A_CLK] = &msm8998_aggre2_noc_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &msm8998_qdss_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &msm8998_qdss_a_clk,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1] = &msm8998_rf_clk1,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK1_A] = &msm8998_rf_clk1_a,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_PIN] = &msm8998_rf_clk2_pin,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK2_A_PIN] = &msm8998_rf_clk2_a_pin,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3] = &msm8998_rf_clk3,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3_A] = &msm8998_rf_clk3_a,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3_PIN] = &msm8998_rf_clk3_pin,
>>> +    [RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3_A_PIN] = &msm8998_rf_clk3_a_pin,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8998 = {
>>> +    .clks = msm8998_clks,
>>> +    .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8998_clks),
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>   static const struct of_device_id rpm_smd_clk_match_table[] = {
>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8916 },
>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8974", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8974 },
>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8996", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8996 },
>>> +    { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-msm8998", .data = &rpm_clk_msm8998 },
>>>       { .compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-qcs404",  .data = &rpm_clk_qcs404  },
>>>       { }
>>>   };
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h 
>>> b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h
>>> index 3658b0c..81dbd1f 100644
>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h
>>> @@ -127,5 +127,11 @@
>>>   #define RPM_SMD_BIMC_GPU_A_CLK            77
>>>   #define RPM_SMD_QPIC_CLK            78
>>>   #define RPM_SMD_QPIC_CLK_A            79
>>> +#define RPM_SMD_BB_CLK3_PIN            80
>>> +#define RPM_SMD_BB_CLK3_A_PIN            81
>>> +#define RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3                82
>>> +#define RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3_A            83
>>> +#define RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3_PIN            84
>>> +#define RPM_SMD_RF_CLK3_A_PIN            85
>>>   #endif
>>>
>>
>> What's the difference between RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK and RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1?
>>
>> $ git grep RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:                  clocks = 
>> <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi:                          
>> <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c: [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK] = &msm8996_ln_bb_clk,
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c: [RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK] = &qcs404_ln_bb_clk,
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h:#define 
>> RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK                        74
>>
>>
>> $ git grep 'RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1\>'
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/qcom,wcd9335.txt:                
>> <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1>;
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c: [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1]               = 
>> &msm8916_bb_clk1,
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c: [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1] = &msm8996_bb_clk1,
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c: [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1] = &msm8998_bb_clk1,
>> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h:#define 
>> RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1                          10
>>
>>
>> Because the downstream kernel defines:
>>
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPM_SMD_XO_BUFFER(ln_bb_clk1, ln_bb_clk1_ao, LN_BB_CLK1_ID);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPM_SMD_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(ln_bb_clk1_pin, ln_bb_clk1_pin_ao,
>>                      LN_BB_CLK1_PIN_ID);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPM_SMD_XO_BUFFER(ln_bb_clk2, ln_bb_clk2_ao, LN_BB_CLK2_ID);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPM_SMD_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(ln_bb_clk2_pin, ln_bb_clk2_pin_ao,
>>                      LN_BB_CLK2_PIN_ID);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPM_SMD_XO_BUFFER(ln_bb_clk3, ln_bb_clk3_ao, LN_BB_CLK3_ID);
>> DEFINE_CLK_RPM_SMD_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(ln_bb_clk3_pin, ln_bb_clk3_pin_ao,
>>                      LN_BB_CLK3_PIN_ID);
>>
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk1),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk1_ao),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk1_pin),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk1_pin_ao),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk2),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk2_ao),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk2_pin),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk2_pin_ao),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk3),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk3_ao),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk3_pin),
>>     CLK_LIST(ln_bb_clk3_pin_ao),
>>
>>
>> While your patch defines
>>
>> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, bb_clk1, bb_clk1_a, 1);
>> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, bb_clk2, bb_clk2_a, 2);
>> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, bb_clk3_pin, 
>> bb_clk3_a_pin, 3);
>>
>>     [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1] = &msm8998_bb_clk1,
>>     [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK1_A] = &msm8998_bb_clk1_a,
>>     [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK2] = &msm8998_bb_clk2,
>>     [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK2_A] = &msm8998_bb_clk2_a,
>>     [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK3_PIN] = &msm8998_bb_clk3_pin,
>>     [RPM_SMD_BB_CLK3_A_PIN] = &msm8998_bb_clk3_a_pin,
>>
> 
> Good question.  I don't know.
> 
> The downstream ln_bb IDs correspond to the bb IDs used by upstream 8996, 
> where as the upstream 8996 ln_bb IDs are different.  The IDs seem to be 
> the important thing, where as the "name" seems to be fairly irrelevant 
> to the actual handling of the clock.
> 
> I haven't yet found documentation other than the downstream code about 
> these clocks, so I chose to be consistent with 8996.

I found some schematics, and they have "ln_bb", so I'll respin with that 
nomenclature after I have a look at your crash.

> 
> Also, as a side note, I limited the list of clocks I enumerated to those 
> which the downstream driver defined, and were used when grepping the 
> downstream DT.
> 


-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ