[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6b86f5a-ef90-8770-8091-5a143ab00754@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 11:07:54 -0500
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
hch@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, bp@...e.de,
thomas.lendacky@....com, luto@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mchehab@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com,
Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@...cle.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rdunlap@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, roger.pau@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH
entry point
On 12/7/18 5:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:14:34PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> There are some minor changes in non-xen x86 code so it would be good to
>>> get x86 maintainers' ack.
>> It's not really code, only Kconfig (and I remarked on it just now), but
>> it doesn't hurt of course.
> Yeah, I don't see anything objectionable.
Can this be considered as an ACK from you?
-boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists