linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/22] mfd: sta2x11: drop unused MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181207163941.GA9430@mail.gnudd.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:39:41 +0100
From:   Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
To:     paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ciminaghi@...dd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/22] mfd: sta2x11: drop unused MODULE_ tags from
 non-modular code

> Subject: [PATCH] mfd: sta2x11: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

Acked-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>

> Alessandro, Davide - you can find additional context regarding why we
> are making these changes in the [00/22] e-mail that can be found here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1543811009-15112-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com/

Thanks a lot for this extra link. Yes, I agree.

I set up this as a module because /sys/modules has much more than what
is actually a module, and the "module" concept brings it the idea
of module parameters, that are available for built-in code too, with
the module namespace.  But it's actually not used in this case.

Thanks
/alessandro