[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB572609DBC52F7496A656915E99A50@VI1PR04MB5726.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:39:20 +0000
From: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"frieder.schrempf@...eet.de" <frieder.schrempf@...eet.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode
Hi Boris,
Sorry for confusion.
My intention was just to point to the correct patch number only. Earlier you have asked Mark to pick the patch [1] but that patch number was not correct.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/5/758
--
Regards
Yogesh Gaur
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@...tlin.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 1:52 PM
> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>; Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>; linux-
> mtd@...ts.infradead.org; marek.vasut@...il.com; linux-spi@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; robh@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com;
> shawnguo@...nel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> computersforpeace@...il.com; frieder.schrempf@...eet.de; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode
>
> Hi Yogesh,
>
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:13:28 +0000
> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Patch has been resend [1], this patch is depends on the series of patch[2] and
> this series has been applied by Boris already.
>
> You're still not asking the right person. Every patches touching things in
> drivers/mtd/ should be taken by me (or another MTD maintainer), and patches
> touching things in drivers/spi/ should be taken by Mark. So, the patch you're
> pointing to should be applied by me. Plus, I told you I would apply it after 4.21-
> rc1 because I don't want to deal with the mtd -> spi dependency.
>
> Please be patient.
>
> Regards,
>
> Boris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists