[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181210095042.354d422f@bbrezillon>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:50:42 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"frieder.schrempf@...eet.de" <frieder.schrempf@...eet.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 08:39:20 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Sorry for confusion.
>
> My intention was just to point to the correct patch number only. Earlier you have asked Mark to pick the patch [1] but that patch number was not correct.
Look at the context in [1] (we have good reasons to reply inline instead
of top-posting). I asked Mark to pick "spi: nxp-fspi: add octal mode
flag bit for octal support", not the m25p80 changes. I was wrong
though, as the patch I pointed to depends on your nxp-fspi patchset
which as not been merged yet.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/5/758
Powered by blists - more mailing lists