lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:14:37 -0800
From:   Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
To:     ldv@...linux.org
Cc:     oleg@...hat.com, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        lineprinter@...linux.org, esyr@...hat.com,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, eparis@...hat.com,
        linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 19/25] xtensa: define syscall_get_* functions

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:53 AM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 09:02:50PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> > How should we synchronize our changes?
>
> No problem, I can revert to the previous edition of this patch
> that just adds syscall_get_arch.
> Alternatively, you can just take that couple of patches (v5 18/25
> and v2 15/15) into your tree.

Sure I can do the second. Will it work for v2 16/15 that changes
syscall_get_arch adding an argument to it?

--
Thanks.
-- Max

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ