linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 19/25] xtensa: define syscall_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:24:02 +0300
From:   "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To:     Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>,
        Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
        linux-audit@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 19/25] xtensa: define syscall_get_* functions

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:14:37PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:53 AM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 09:02:50PM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> > > How should we synchronize our changes?
> >
> > No problem, I can revert to the previous edition of this patch
> > that just adds syscall_get_arch.
> > Alternatively, you can just take that couple of patches (v5 18/25
> > and v2 15/15) into your tree.
> 
> Sure I can do the second. Will it work for v2 16/15 that changes
> syscall_get_arch adding an argument to it?

No, I'm afraid it won't work for v2 16/15 (aka v5 22/25), which means
I'd have to keep them in the series.


-- 
ldv

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)