linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aio: Convert ioctx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <75267003-9407-101f-33ee-685e345a2c8a@kernel.dk>
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:46:53 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Convert ioctx_table to XArray

On 12/11/18 11:45 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:41:55AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:35 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>         rcu_read_lock();
>>> -       table = rcu_dereference(mm->ioctx_table);
>>> -
>>> -       if (!table || id >= table->nr)
>>> -               goto out;
>>> -
>>> -       ctx = rcu_dereference(table->table[id]);
>>> +       ctx = xa_load(&mm->ioctx, id);
>>>         if (ctx && ctx->user_id == ctx_id) {
>>>                 if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&ctx->users))
>>>                         ret = ctx;
>>>         }
>>
>> Question on this part - do we need that RCU read lock around this now? I
>> don't think we do.
> 
> I think we need the rcu read lock here to prevent ctx from being freed
> under us by free_ioctx().

Then that begs the question, how about __xa_load() that is already called
under RCU read lock?

-- 
Jens Axboe