lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:31:23 -0800
From:   Jaesoo Lee <jalee@...estorage.com>
To:     sagi@...mberg.me
Cc:     nitzanc@...lanox.com, keith.busch@...el.com, axboe@...com,
        hch@....de, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
        Prabhath Sajeepa <psajeepa@...estorage.com>,
        Ashish Karkare <ashishk@...estorage.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-rdma: complete requests from ->timeout

Please drop this patch. However, it would be happy if this bug can be
fixed as soon as possible.

Nitzan, do you mind if you send your patch for review?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:39 PM Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me> wrote:
>
> > I cannot reproduce the bug with the patch; in my failure scenarios, it
> > seems that completing the request on errors in nvme_rdma_send_done
> > makes __nvme_submit_sync_cmd to be unblocked. Also, I think this is
> > safe from the double completions.
> >
> > However, it seems that nvme_rdma_timeout code is still not free from
> > the double completion problem. So, it looks promising to me if you
> > could separate out the nvme_rdma_wr_error handling code as a new
> > patch.
>
> Guys, can you please send proper patches so we can review properly?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ