lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:42:56 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To:     김성경 <jotun9935@...il.com>
CC:     <yuchao0@...wei.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: erofs: Add a blank line after declarations



On 2018/12/13 11:29, 김성경 wrote:
> Thank you. I appreciate it for your prompt reply.
> 
> 
> As a result of checking through 'checkpatch.pl <http://checkpatch.pl>', there was only one coding style problem in 'erofs / inode.c' file.
> 
> 
> I will check for other files and send the patch file soon.

Yes, if you confirm that this is the only one place, I think this patch is ok for me personally. :)

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sungkyung Kim 
> 
> 
> 2018년 12월 13일 (목) 오전 10:51, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com <mailto:gaoxiang25@...wei.com>>님이 작성:
> 
>     Hi Sungkyung,
> 
>     On 2018/12/12 23:50, Sungkyung Kim wrote:
>     > Fix a warning from checkpathch.pl <http://checkpathch.pl>: 'Missing a blank line after
>     > declarations'
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Sungkyung Kim <jotun9935@...il.com <mailto:jotun9935@...il.com>>
>     > ---
>     >  drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c | 1 +
>     >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>     >
>     > diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c
>     > index 04c61a9d7b76..82b6ad5badff 100644
>     > --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c
>     > +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/inode.c
>     > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ struct inode *erofs_iget(struct super_block *sb,
>     >       if (inode->i_state & I_NEW) {
>     >               int err;
>     >               struct erofs_vnode *vi = EROFS_V(inode);
>     > +
> 
>     Thanks for your patch, is there a only one 'Missing a blank line after declarations' in erofs?
> 
>     If not, could you have time check the other files? That is my personal thought, and
>     I cc-ed the staging mailing list as well.
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Gao Xiang
> 
>     >               vi->nid = nid;
>     > 
>     >               err = fill_inode(inode, isdir);
>     >
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ