[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9sWw=VHjYivokAkhGP+p1P15bs3ThfRghARNesW5kyOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:48:07 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: louiscollard@...omium.org
Cc: "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, mpm@...enic.com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
gary.hook@....com, m@...s.ch,
PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
apronin@...omium.org,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux@...ewoehner.de, david.bild@...tum.com,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Allow hwrng to initialize crng.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 10:18, Louis Collard <louiscollard@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Some systems, for example embedded systems, do not generate
> enough entropy on boot through interrupts, and boot may be blocked for
> several minutes waiting for a call to getrandom to complete.
>
> Currently, random data is read from a hwrng when it is registered,
> and is loaded into primary_crng. This data is treated in the same
> way as data that is device-specific but otherwise unchanging, and
> so primary_crng cannot become initialized with the data from the
> hwrng.
>
> This change causes the data initially read from the hwrng to be
> treated the same as subsequent data that is read from the hwrng if
> it's quality score is non-zero.
>
> The implications of this are:
>
> The data read from hwrng can cause primary_crng to become
> initialized, therefore avoiding problems of getrandom blocking
> on boot.
>
> Calls to getrandom (with GRND_RANDOM) may be using entropy
> exclusively (or in practise, almost exclusively) from the hwrng.
>
> Regarding the latter point; this behavior is the same as if a
> user specified a quality score of 1 (bit of entropy per 1024 bits)
> so hopefully this is not too scary a change to make.
>
> This change is the result of the discussion here:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10453893/
>
> Signed-off-by: Louis Collard <louiscollard@...omium.org>
> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/hw_random/core.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> index 95be7228f327..7736e1a96321 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/core.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <crypto/chacha20.h>
>
> #define RNG_MODULE_NAME "hw_random"
>
> @@ -64,13 +65,19 @@ static size_t rng_buffer_size(void)
> static void add_early_randomness(struct hwrng *rng)
> {
> int bytes_read;
> - size_t size = min_t(size_t, 16, rng_buffer_size());
> + /* Read enough to initialize crng. */
> + size_t size = min_t(size_t,
> + 2*CHACHA20_KEY_SIZE,
This should be as symbolic constant that retains its meaning even if
we move away from ChaCha20 or modify the current implementation
> + rng_buffer_size());
>
> mutex_lock(&reading_mutex);
> bytes_read = rng_get_data(rng, rng_buffer, size, 1);
> mutex_unlock(&reading_mutex);
> if (bytes_read > 0)
> - add_device_randomness(rng_buffer, bytes_read);
> + /* Allow crng to become initialized, but do not add
> + * entropy to the pool.
> + */
> + add_hwgenerator_randomness(rng_buffer, bytes_read, 0);
> }
>
> static inline void cleanup_rng(struct kref *kref)
> --
> 2.13.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists