linux-kernel - Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Dec 2018 10:47:18 +0100
From:   Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Darren Stevens <darren@...vens-zone.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julian Margetson <runaway@...dw.ms>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4

On 13 December 2018 at 10:10AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:41:50AM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>> Today I tried the first patch (0001-get_required_mask.patch) with the last
>> good commit (977706f9755d2d697aa6f45b4f9f0e07516efeda). Unfortunately this
>> patch is already included in the last good commit
>> (977706f9755d2d697aa6f45b4f9f0e07516efeda). I will try the next patch.
> Hmm, I don't think this is the case.  This is my local git log output:
>
> commit 83a4b87de6bc6a75b500c9959de88e2157fbcd7c
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date:   Wed Dec 12 15:07:49 2018 +0100
>
>      get_required_mask
>
> commit 977706f9755d2d697aa6f45b4f9f0e07516efeda
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date:   Sat Nov 10 22:34:27 2018 +0100
>
>      powerpc/dma: remove dma_nommu_mmap_coherent
>
> I've also pushed a git branch with these out to:
>
>      git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git powerpc-dma.5-debug
>
Sorry Christioph. I was wrong. The first patch isn't included in the 
last good commit. I will try it again. I can only test beside my main 
work. That means it takes longer.

-- Christian