[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1e35845-cb07-048f-bcf7-d7239a387027@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:18:02 -0800
From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vijay Khemka <vijaykhemka@...com>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"james.feist@...ux.intel.com" <james.feist@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add sensors devices for Facebook
Hi Vijay,
On 12/14/2018 10:11 AM, Vijay Khemka wrote:
> On 12/13/18, 2:56 PM, "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au> wrote:
<snip>
> > + oemname0 = "MB_P3V3";
> > + oemname1 = "MB_P5V";
> > + oemname2 = "MB_P12V";
> > + oemname3 = "MB_P1V05";
> > + oemname4 = "MB_PVNN_PCH_STBY";
> > + oemname5 = "MB_P3V3_STBY";
> > + oemname6 = "MB_P5V_STBY";
>
> "oemname" isn't part of the upstream bindings. Is this something you
> have patches for?
> This is a workaround field used by dbus-sensors application to avoid overlay for dynamic detection of devices based on json file definition.
>
> Can you please also review other 3 patches in this series.
>
>
These oemname settings should not be added into here. You can add these
information into configuration of entity manager which uses overlay
templates for dbus-sensors. Also, as Joel said, "oemname" isn't part of
the upstream bindings.
Cheers,
Jae
Powered by blists - more mailing lists