[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181217135632.fisfyfkt4473q7ze@xps.therub.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 07:56:32 -0600
From: Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/142] 4.19.10-stable review
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:11:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:01:02AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:58:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.10 release.
> > > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:57:12 UTC 2018.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions detected.
>
> They were?
My mistake. There were some false regressions that showed up and I was a
bit distracted when sending the reports and missed that.
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> >
> > Summary
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > kernel: 4.19.10-rc1
> > git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > git branch: linux-4.19.y
> > git commit: 4875bf1f86d7bdc8dbf3222ab4028239446fab3f
> > git describe: v4.19.9-143-g4875bf1f86d7
> > Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.19-oe/build/v4.19.9-143-g4875bf1f86d7
> >
> > No regressions (compared to build v4.19.9)
> >
> > No fixes (compared to build v4.19.9)
> >
> > Ran 18346 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
>
> This said there were no regressions.
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists