[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181217141230.GA26946@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:12:30 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/142] 4.19.10-stable review
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:56:32AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:11:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:01:02AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:58:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.10 release.
> > > > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:57:12 UTC 2018.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > Regressions detected.
> >
> > They were?
>
> My mistake. There were some false regressions that showed up and I was a
> bit distracted when sending the reports and missed that.
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Ok, good, thanks for confirming, I was confused :)
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists