[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181217190834.GB13773@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:08:34 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/88] 4.4.168-stable review
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:46:01AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 12/17/18 1:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:58:13PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 07:45 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On 12/15/18 12:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 06:10:29PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > On 12/14/18 3:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.168 release.
> > > > > > > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:56:41 UTC 2018.
> > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Build results:
> > > > > > total: 170 pass: 145 fail: 25
> > > > > > Failed builds:
> > > > > > arm:allnoconfig
> > > > > > arm:tinyconfig
> > > > > > arm:efm32_defconfig
> > > > > > blackfin:defconfig
> > > > > > blackfin:BF561-EZKIT-SMP_defconfig
> > > > > > c6x:dsk6455_defconfig
> > > > > > c6x:evmc6457_defconfig
> > > > > > c6x:evmc6678_defconfig
> > > > > > h8300:allnoconfig
> > > > > > h8300:tinyconfig
> > > > > > h8300:edosk2674_defconfig
> > > > > > h8300:h8300h-sim_defconfig
> > > > > > h8300:h8s-sim_defconfig
> > > > > > m68k:allnoconfig
> > > > > > m68k:tinyconfig
> > > > > > m68k:m5272c3_defconfig
> > > > > > m68k:m5307c3_defconfig
> > > > > > m68k:m5249evb_defconfig
> > > > > > m68k:m5407c3_defconfig
> > > > > > microblaze:nommu_defconfig
> > > > > > microblaze:allnoconfig
> > > > > > microblaze:tinyconfig
> > > > > > sh:defconfig
> > > > > > sh:allnoconfig
> > > > > > sh:tinyconfig
> > > > > > Qemu test results:
> > > > > > total: 288 pass: 288 fail: 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c: In function '__get_user_pages_unlocked':
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:211:49: error: 'write' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:211:56: error: 'force' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:212:9: warning: passing argument 7 of 'get_user_pages' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:185:6: note: expected 'struct vm_area_struct **' but argument is of type 'struct page **'
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:212:9: error: too many arguments to function 'get_user_pages'
> > > > > > mm/nommu.c:185:6: note: declared here
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Details are available at https://kerneltests.org/builders/.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ugh, I'll dig through this later on today, we must be missing something
> > > > > with those backports that Ben did...
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 69ce144e5c3a ("mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters
> > > > with gup_flags") seems to have missed converting a call of
> > > > get_user_pages().
> > >
> > > Right. This was changed earlier upstream in commit cde70140fed8
> > > "mm/gup: Overload get_user_pages() functions", but I don't think it
> > > makes sense to apply all of that. I'm attaching a minimal patch
> > > (tested with an arm allnoconfig build) which should ideally be inserted
> > > before mm-replace-get_user_pages-write-force-parameters-with-
> > > gup_flags.patch.
> > >
> > > Ben.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd
> > > https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street
> > > Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom
> >
> > > From 0d0afe933f60f5736c984e9171214aa34b18764c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
> > > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:50:08 +0000
> > > Subject: [PATCH] mm/nommu.c: Switch __get_user_pages_unlocked() to use
> > > __get_user_pages()
> > >
> > > Extracted from commit cde70140fed8 "mm/gup: Overload get_user_pages()
> > > functions". This is needed before picking commit 768ae309a961
> > > "mm: replace get_user_pages() write/force parameters with gup_flags".
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > > mm/nommu.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/nommu.c b/mm/nommu.c
> > > index fa1560c218d5..2360546db065 100644
> > > --- a/mm/nommu.c
> > > +++ b/mm/nommu.c
> > > @@ -208,8 +208,8 @@ long __get_user_pages_unlocked(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > {
> > > long ret;
> > > down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > > - ret = get_user_pages(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, write, force,
> > > - pages, NULL);
> > > + ret = __get_user_pages(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, gup_flags, pages,
> > > + NULL, NULL);
> > > up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. I've added it to the queue and pushed out a -rc2
> > with this in it.
> >
> > Let's see what the builders say :)
> >
>
> v4.4.167-89-g9c558d7fe359 seemed to be happy. v4.4.167-89-g50a0280f2f7e
> replaced it and will take a while.
If I read your site right, it passed everything except one qemu test?
Is that normal?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists