linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/88] 4.4.168-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181217201209.GC29585@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2018 12:12:09 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/88] 4.4.168-stable review

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:08:34PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > v4.4.167-89-g9c558d7fe359 seemed to be happy. v4.4.167-89-g50a0280f2f7e
> > replaced it and will take a while.
> 
> If I read your site right, it passed everything except one qemu test?
> Is that normal?
> 

Kind of. I was playing with that specific build, swapping out the root file
system, and that was broken for a bit. I restarted the test, but for all
practial purposes the build is fine.

Guenter