[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181218100119.3lf5ktzqbqkwsfb2@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:01:19 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Add caller information to printk() output.
On Tue 2018-12-18 17:55:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (12/18/18 06:05), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER
> > +static size_t print_caller(u32 id, char *buf)
> > +{
> > + char from[12];
> > +
> > + snprintf(from, sizeof(from), "%c%u",
> > + id & 0x80000000 ? 'C' : 'T', id & ~0x80000000);
> > + return sprintf(buf, "[%6s]", from);
> > +}
>
> A nitpick:
>
> s/from/caller/g :)
Great catch!
>
> > + Selecting this option causes "thread id" (if in task context) or
> > + "processor id" (if not in task context) of the printk() messages
> > + to be added.
>
> Would the following wording be a bit simpler?
>
> "Selecting this option causes printk() to add a caller "thread id" (if
> in task context) or a caller "processor id" (if not in task context)
> to every message."
It sounds good to me.
I have updated the patch in printk.git, for-4.22 branch.
Best Regards,
Petr
PS: I think that I have rushed the patch probably too much.
I did too much nitpicking in the past and am trying to find
a better balance now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists