linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c: Convert to use vm_insert

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFqt6zbQkFbX57D2kJqZa_gMH7tGzY6FGUJE7Y14kmiiHEv1AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:27:45 +0530
From:   Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, robin.murphy@....com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, treding@...dia.com,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c: Convert to use vm_insert_range

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 3:08 PM Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:52:09AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > Convert to use vm_insert_range() to map range of kernel
> > memory to user vma.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > index 661fe48..7cbcde5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> > @@ -1582,31 +1582,24 @@ static int __arm_iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma
> >                   void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> >                   unsigned long attrs)
> >  {
> > -     unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
> > -     unsigned long usize = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> > +     unsigned long page_count = vma_pages(vma);
> >       struct page **pages = __iommu_get_pages(cpu_addr, attrs);
> >       unsigned long nr_pages = PAGE_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >       unsigned long off = vma->vm_pgoff;
> > +     int err;
> >
> >       if (!pages)
> >               return -ENXIO;
> >
> > -     if (off >= nr_pages || (usize >> PAGE_SHIFT) > nr_pages - off)
> > +     if (off >= nr_pages)
> >               return -ENXIO;
>
> Are you sure you can make this change?
>
> You are restricting the offset to be within 0..nr_pages which ensures
> that the initial struct page that is passed to vm_insert_range() is
> valid, but I think the removal of the following check is unsafe.
>
> Your new vm_insert_range() function only checks page_count <=
> vma_pages(vma), which it will be since it _is_ vma_pages(vma).  With
> the removal of the second condition, there will be nothing checking
> that (eg) off may be nr_pages - 1, and page_count=50, meaning that
> vm_insert_range() will walk off the end of the page array.
>
> Please take another look at this.

This check shouldn't be removed.
>
> What about the other callsites of your new function - do they have
> the same issue?

I think other callsites don't have the same issue.

>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up