[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5533533242C036C5CF6352BAEEBD0@VI1PR04MB5533.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:09:02 +0000
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: imx6: Add support for i.MX8MQ
On 12/18/2018 5:15 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 08:07:02PM -0800, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
>> Add code needed to support i.MX8MQ variant.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie.txt
>>
>> +Additional required properties for imx8mq-pcie:
>> +- fsl,controller-id: Logical ID of a given PCIE controller. PCIE1 is 0, PCIE2 is 1;
>> +
>
> Remove this.
>
> If GPR register offset is what you need, then put that into DT.
> Typically, we'd have a property with iomuxc phandle and offset.
This series initially added explicit offsets but I suggested a single
"controller-id" because:
* There are multiple bit and byte offsets
* Other imx8 SOCs also have 2x pcie with other bit/byte offsets
Hiding this behind a compatible string and single "controller-id" seem
preferable to elaborating register maps in dt bindings. It also makes
upgrades simpler: if features are added which use other bits there is no
need to describe them in DT and deal with compatibility headaches.
Link to older thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/29/888
It's possible my suggestion was misguided.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists