linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:26:30 +0800
From:   "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] x86/fpu: track AVX-512 usage of tasks

On 2018/12/19 5:38, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> I misunderstood, you mean 32bit kernel, not 32bit machine. Theoretically 32bit
>> kernel can use AVX512, but not sure if anyone use it like this. get_jiffies_64()
>> includes jiffies_lock ops so not good in context switch. So I want to use raw
>> jiffies_64 here. jiffies is a good candidate but it has wraparound overflow issue.
>> Other time source are expensive here.
>>
>> Should I limit the code only running on 64bit kernel? 
> 
> Yes making it 64bit only should be fine.
> 


> Other alternative would be to use 32bit jiffies on 32bit. I assume
> wrapping is not that big a problem here.
> 

Thomas, is this acceptable?

Thanks,
-Aubrey