[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a05a7975-b09b-fd0a-8af1-82ab3b90596e@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:39:42 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] scsi: csiostor: csio_wr: mark expected switch
fall-through
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:28 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056538 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c
> index dc12933533d5..b6861ea66c9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c
> @@ -808,6 +808,7 @@ csio_wr_destroy_queues(struct csio_hw *hw, bool cmd)
>
> csio_q_eqid(hw, i) = CSIO_MAX_QID;
> }
> + /* fall through */
> case CSIO_INGRESS:
> if (csio_q_iqid(hw, i) != CSIO_MAX_QID) {
> csio_wr_cleanup_iq_ftr(hw, i);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists