| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1a29b249-e248-d4ea-525e-e5f3efece00f@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:28:09 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/41] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_sli: Mark expected switch
fall-throughs
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:32 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Drop thru" and
> "Fall Thru" with "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC
> is expecting to find.
>
> Also, in some cases a dash is added as a token in order to separate
> the "fall through" annotation from the rest of the comment on the
> same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114979 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114980 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> index 3912a2d0b95d..cbcda5a91068 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> @@ -9334,6 +9334,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_iocb2wqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *iocbq,
> cmnd = CMD_XMIT_SEQUENCE64_CR;
> if (phba->link_flag & LS_LOOPBACK_MODE)
> bf_set(wqe_xo, &wqe->xmit_sequence.wge_ctl, 1);
> + /* fall through */
> case CMD_XMIT_SEQUENCE64_CR:
> /* word3 iocb=io_tag32 wqe=reserved */
> wqe->xmit_sequence.rsvd3 = 0;
> @@ -13460,6 +13461,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_sp_handle_rcqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_rcqe *rcqe)
> case FC_STATUS_RQ_BUF_LEN_EXCEEDED:
> lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_SLI,
> "2537 Receive Frame Truncated!!\n");
> + /* fall through */
> case FC_STATUS_RQ_SUCCESS:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
> lpfc_sli4_rq_release(hrq, drq);
> @@ -13859,7 +13861,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_nvmet_handle_rcqe(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *cq,
> case FC_STATUS_RQ_BUF_LEN_EXCEEDED:
> lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_SLI,
> "6126 Receive Frame Truncated!!\n");
> - /* Drop thru */
> + /* fall through */
> case FC_STATUS_RQ_SUCCESS:
> spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->hbalock, iflags);
> lpfc_sli4_rq_release(hrq, drq);
> @@ -14769,7 +14771,7 @@ lpfc_eq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *eq, uint32_t imax)
> eq->entry_count);
> if (eq->entry_count < 256)
> return -EINVAL;
> - /* otherwise default to smallest count (drop through) */
> + /* fall through - otherwise default to smallest count */
> case 256:
> bf_set(lpfc_eq_context_count, &eq_create->u.request.context,
> LPFC_EQ_CNT_256);
> @@ -14899,7 +14901,7 @@ lpfc_cq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *cq,
> LPFC_CQ_CNT_WORD7);
> break;
> }
> - /* Fall Thru */
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_SLI,
> "0361 Unsupported CQ count: "
> @@ -14910,7 +14912,7 @@ lpfc_cq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *cq,
> status = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> - /* otherwise default to smallest count (drop through) */
> + /* fall through - otherwise default to smallest count */
> case 256:
> bf_set(lpfc_cq_context_count, &cq_create->u.request.context,
> LPFC_CQ_CNT_256);
> @@ -15070,7 +15072,7 @@ lpfc_cq_create_set(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue **cqp,
> LPFC_CQ_CNT_WORD7);
> break;
> }
> - /* Fall Thru */
> + /* fall through */
> default:
> lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_SLI,
> "3118 Bad CQ count. (%d)\n",
> @@ -15079,7 +15081,7 @@ lpfc_cq_create_set(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue **cqp,
> status = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> - /* otherwise default to smallest (drop thru) */
> + /* fall through - otherwise default to smallest */
> case 256:
> bf_set(lpfc_mbx_cq_create_set_cqe_cnt,
> &cq_set->u.request, LPFC_CQ_CNT_256);
> @@ -15351,7 +15353,7 @@ lpfc_mq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *mq,
> status = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> - /* otherwise default to smallest count (drop through) */
> + /* fall through - otherwise default to smallest count */
> case 16:
> bf_set(lpfc_mq_context_ring_size,
> &mq_create_ext->u.request.context,
> @@ -15770,7 +15772,7 @@ lpfc_rq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *hrq,
> status = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> - /* otherwise default to smallest count (drop through) */
> + /* fall through - otherwise default to smallest count */
> case 512:
> bf_set(lpfc_rq_context_rqe_count,
> &rq_create->u.request.context,
> @@ -15907,7 +15909,7 @@ lpfc_rq_create(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_queue *hrq,
> status = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> - /* otherwise default to smallest count (drop through) */
> + /* fall through - otherwise default to smallest count */
> case 512:
> bf_set(lpfc_rq_context_rqe_count,
> &rq_create->u.request.context,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists