[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f283763-f5e5-3da2-84e4-7e2a3543cb23@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:26:09 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/41] scsi: imm: mark expected switch fall-throughs
Hi,
Friendly ping:
Who can ack or review this patch, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 11/27/18 10:29 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, I placed all the "Phase N - ..."
> comments on the same line as its corresponding switch case. The same
> way in which similar comments appear in drivers/scsi/ppa.c. This makes
> it possible to place the "fall through" annotations at the bottom of
> each switch case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/imm.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/imm.c b/drivers/scsi/imm.c
> index 8c6627bc8a39..629e0bc70d3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/imm.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/imm.c
> @@ -796,21 +796,21 @@ static int imm_engine(imm_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> return 0;
> }
> return 1; /* wait until imm_wakeup claims parport */
> - /* Phase 1 - Connected */
> - case 1:
> +
> + case 1: /* Phase 1 - Connected */
> imm_connect(dev, CONNECT_EPP_MAYBE);
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> + /* fall through */
>
> - /* Phase 2 - We are now talking to the scsi bus */
> - case 2:
> + case 2: /* Phase 2 - We are now talking to the scsi bus */
> if (!imm_select(dev, scmd_id(cmd))) {
> imm_fail(dev, DID_NO_CONNECT);
> return 0;
> }
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> + /* fall through */
>
> - /* Phase 3 - Ready to accept a command */
> - case 3:
> + case 3: /* Phase 3 - Ready to accept a command */
> w_ctr(ppb, 0x0c);
> if (!(r_str(ppb) & 0x80))
> return 1;
> @@ -818,9 +818,9 @@ static int imm_engine(imm_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> if (!imm_send_command(cmd))
> return 0;
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> + /* fall through */
>
> - /* Phase 4 - Setup scatter/gather buffers */
> - case 4:
> + case 4: /* Phase 4 - Setup scatter/gather buffers */
> if (scsi_bufflen(cmd)) {
> cmd->SCp.buffer = scsi_sglist(cmd);
> cmd->SCp.this_residual = cmd->SCp.buffer->length;
> @@ -834,8 +834,9 @@ static int imm_engine(imm_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> if (cmd->SCp.this_residual & 0x01)
> cmd->SCp.this_residual++;
> - /* Phase 5 - Pre-Data transfer stage */
> - case 5:
> + /* fall through */
> +
> + case 5: /* Phase 5 - Pre-Data transfer stage */
> /* Spin lock for BUSY */
> w_ctr(ppb, 0x0c);
> if (!(r_str(ppb) & 0x80))
> @@ -850,9 +851,9 @@ static int imm_engine(imm_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> if (imm_negotiate(dev))
> return 0;
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> + /* fall through */
>
> - /* Phase 6 - Data transfer stage */
> - case 6:
> + case 6: /* Phase 6 - Data transfer stage */
> /* Spin lock for BUSY */
> w_ctr(ppb, 0x0c);
> if (!(r_str(ppb) & 0x80))
> @@ -866,9 +867,9 @@ static int imm_engine(imm_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> return 1;
> }
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> + /* fall through */
>
> - /* Phase 7 - Post data transfer stage */
> - case 7:
> + case 7: /* Phase 7 - Post data transfer stage */
> if ((dev->dp) && (dev->rd)) {
> if ((dev->mode == IMM_NIBBLE) || (dev->mode == IMM_PS2)) {
> w_ctr(ppb, 0x4);
> @@ -878,9 +879,9 @@ static int imm_engine(imm_struct *dev, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> }
> }
> cmd->SCp.phase++;
> + /* fall through */
>
> - /* Phase 8 - Read status/message */
> - case 8:
> + case 8: /* Phase 8 - Read status/message */
> /* Check for data overrun */
> if (imm_wait(dev) != (unsigned char) 0xb8) {
> imm_fail(dev, DID_ERROR);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists