linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Coordinated Clks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:15:41 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, heiko@...ech.de, aisheng.dong@....com,
        mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
        Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Coordinated Clks

Quoting Derek Basehore (2018-10-23 18:31:26)
> Here's the first set of patches that I'm working on for the Common
> Clk Framework. Part of this patch series adds a new clk op,
> pre_rate_req. This is designed to replace the clk notifier approach
> that many clk drivers use right now to setup alt parents or temporary
> dividers. This should allow for the removal of the
> CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag and the implementation of a better locking
> scheme for the prepare lock.

Are you going to resend this series? I can do a review but I wonder how
much it will change anyway.