[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGAzgsq=p-2N6ybFXNTnz5SDkcdktA+Gk6e3gxrjpJB+L8389A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:20:13 -0800
From: "dbasehore ." <dbasehore@...omium.org>
To: sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
aisheng.dong@....com, mchehab+samsung@...nel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Coordinated Clks
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 1:15 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Derek Basehore (2018-10-23 18:31:26)
> > Here's the first set of patches that I'm working on for the Common
> > Clk Framework. Part of this patch series adds a new clk op,
> > pre_rate_req. This is designed to replace the clk notifier approach
> > that many clk drivers use right now to setup alt parents or temporary
> > dividers. This should allow for the removal of the
> > CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag and the implementation of a better locking
> > scheme for the prepare lock.
>
> Are you going to resend this series? I can do a review but I wonder how
> much it will change anyway.
>
I'm going to resend next year. I got distracted trying to get other
code to work. This code has bugs in it, so a new patch set is
required.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists