linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: bcm2835: Clear current message and count after a transaction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4892f080-dff5-8d08-c78f-3c8b85f5a454@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Dec 2018 09:52:27 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: bcm2835: Clear current message and count after a
 transaction

On 12/21/18 4:11 AM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> The driver's interrupt handler checks whether a message is currently
> being handled with the curr_msg pointer. When it is NULL, the interrupt
> is considered to be unexpected. Similarly, the i2c_start_transfer
> routine checks for the remaining number of messages to handle in
> num_msgs.
> 
> However, these values are never cleared and always keep the message and
> number relevant to the latest transfer (which might be done already and
> the underlying message memory might have been freed).
> 
> When an unexpected interrupt hits with the DONE bit set, the isr will
> then try to access the flags field of the curr_msg structure, leading
> to a fatal page fault.
> 
> Fix the issue by systematically clearing curr_msg and num_msgs in the
> driver-wide device structure when a transfer is considered complete.

Should not this get a Fixes tag?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> index 44deae78913e..5486252f5f2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ static int bcm2835_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}
>  
> +	i2c_dev->curr_msg = NULL;
> +	i2c_dev->num_msgs = 0;
> +
>  	if (!i2c_dev->msg_err)
>  		return num;
>  
> 


-- 
Florian