[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1941132339.131316.1545481176339@email.ionos.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 13:19:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: bcm2835: Clear current message and count after a
transaction
Hi Paul,
> Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com> hat am 21. Dezember 2018 um 13:11 geschrieben:
>
>
> The driver's interrupt handler checks whether a message is currently
> being handled with the curr_msg pointer. When it is NULL, the interrupt
> is considered to be unexpected. Similarly, the i2c_start_transfer
> routine checks for the remaining number of messages to handle in
> num_msgs.
>
> However, these values are never cleared and always keep the message and
> number relevant to the latest transfer (which might be done already and
> the underlying message memory might have been freed).
>
> When an unexpected interrupt hits with the DONE bit set, the isr will
> then try to access the flags field of the curr_msg structure, leading
> to a fatal page fault.
>
> Fix the issue by systematically clearing curr_msg and num_msgs in the
> driver-wide device structure when a transfer is considered complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> index 44deae78913e..5486252f5f2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm2835.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ static int bcm2835_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> + i2c_dev->curr_msg = NULL;
> + i2c_dev->num_msgs = 0;
AFAIU this would reduce the chance of a use-after-free dramatically but not completely.
Btw: Why did you leave of the i2c transfer timeout case?
Thanks
Stefan
> +
> if (!i2c_dev->msg_err)
> return num;
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists