[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181222033213.43642e0f@nic.cz>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 03:32:13 +0100
From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: armada-37xx: Correct mpp definitions
On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 18:32:57 +0100
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com> wrote:
> + PIN_GRP_GPIO("pcie1", 3, 1, BIT(5), "pcie"),
> + PIN_GRP_GPIO("pcie1_clkreq", 4, 1, BIT(9), "pcie"),
If the pair is split to clkreq and reset, shouldn't the first be called
pcie1_reset?
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists