[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181228020243.GH2509588@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:02:43 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, xiezhipeng1@...wei.com,
huawei.libin@...wei.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix infinity loop in update_blocked_averages
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:53:52PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Vincent knows that part way better than me but I think the safest way
> would be doing the optimization removal iff tmp_alone_branch is
> already pointing to leaf_cfs_rq_list. IIUC, it's pointing to
> something else only while a branch is being built and deferring
> optimization removal by an avg update cycle isn't gonna make any
> difference anyway.
So, something like the following. Xie, can you see whether the
following patch resolves the problem?
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d1907506318a..88b9118b5191 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7698,7 +7698,8 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
* There can be a lot of idle CPU cgroups. Don't let fully
* decayed cfs_rqs linger on the list.
*/
- if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) &&
+ rq->tmp_alone_branch == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists