linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: fix infinity loop in update_blocked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:30:33 +0800
From:   Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <xiezhipeng1@...wei.com>, <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix infinity loop in update_blocked_averages

Hi Tejun,

On 2018/12/28 10:02, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:53:52PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Vincent knows that part way better than me but I think the safest way
>> would be doing the optimization removal iff tmp_alone_branch is
>> already pointing to leaf_cfs_rq_list.  IIUC, it's pointing to
>> something else only while a branch is being built and deferring
>> optimization removal by an avg update cycle isn't gonna make any
>> difference anyway.
> 
> So, something like the following.  Xie, can you see whether the
> following patch resolves the problem?

Zhipeng is preparing to test it, thanks.

> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index d1907506318a..88b9118b5191 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7698,7 +7698,8 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
>  		 * There can be a lot of idle CPU cgroups.  Don't let fully
>  		 * decayed cfs_rqs linger on the list.
>  		 */
> -		if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq))
> +		if (cfs_rq_is_decayed(cfs_rq) &&
> +		    rq->tmp_alone_branch == &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list)
>  			list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>  
>  		/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
> 
> .
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi