[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190103123352.GQ1846@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 12:33:52 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ASoC DRIVERS" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 06:10:35PM +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> specified directly. This code relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends
> on PCI. For this reason, add a direct dependency on CONFIG_PCI to the
> IOSF_MBI driver.
I still don't understand what's going on with dependencies here and
still don't have the cover letter or anything :( . As far as I can tell
the above commit is in Linus' tree so I'd expect I can just apply it
directly but you were saying that this needs to go via some other tree
so I'm a bit confused as to what's going on here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists