[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190103123456.GA7586@personal>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 13:34:56 +0100
From: Otto Sabart <ottosabart@...erm.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] doc: cgroup: highlight all paths using the :file:
inline markup
On 02. Jan (Wednesday) v 09:09:48 -0700 2019, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 08:01:49 -0800
> Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 05:50:44PM +0100, Otto Sabart wrote:
> > > Improve readability using the :file: markup.
> >
> > Heh, that's a minor plus for formatted output and minor minus for the
> > source. If this is a convention generally followed for
> > documentations, I have no objects. That said, can you please reflow
> > the lines?
>
> The convention is to minimize markup, especially in cases where it's not
> really needed and it impairs the readability of the plain-text file. My
> feeling is that this particular markup doesn't provide enough benefit to
> be worth the cost.
>
> Otto, we all very much appreciate attempts to improve the documentation,
> and I hope you won't stop. If you would like to do RST work, one very
> helpful thing would be to look into the conversion of the (many) remaining
> plain-text documents and integration into the doc tree.
>
Hello Jon,
ok, I try to take a look into it.
Thank you,
Ota
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists