[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1546745293-5678-1-git-send-email-kchen@synology.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 11:28:13 +0800
From: kchen <kchen@...ology.com>
To: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net: bridge: fix a bug on using a neighbour cache entry without checking its state
From: JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
When handling DNAT'ed packets on a bridge device, the neighbour cache entry
from lookup was used without checking its state. It means that a cache entry
in the NUD_STALE state will be used directly instead of entering the NUD_DELAY
state to confirm the reachability of the neighbor.
This problem becomes worse after commit 2724680bceee ("neigh: Keep neighbour
cache entries if number of them is small enough."), since all neighbour cache
entries in the NUD_STALE state will be kept in the neighbour table as long as
the number of cache entries does not exceed the value specified in gc_thresh1.
This commit validates the state of a neighbour cache entry before using
the entry.
Signed-off-by: JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
Reviewed-by: JinLin Chen <jlchen@...ology.com>
---
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index b1b5e85..ed683e5 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_
struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
int ret;
- if (neigh->hh.hh_len) {
+ if ((neigh->nud_state & NUD_CONNECTED) && neigh->hh.hh_len) {
neigh_hh_bridge(&neigh->hh, skb);
skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev;
ret = br_handle_frame_finish(net, sk, skb);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists