lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1546745293-5678-1-git-send-email-kchen@synology.com>
Date:   Sun,  6 Jan 2019 11:28:13 +0800
From:   kchen <kchen@...ology.com>
To:     nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net: bridge: fix a bug on using a neighbour cache entry without checking its state

From: JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>

When handling DNAT'ed packets on a bridge device, the neighbour cache entry
from lookup was used without checking its state. It means that a cache entry
in the NUD_STALE state will be used directly instead of entering the NUD_DELAY
state to confirm the reachability of the neighbor.

This problem becomes worse after commit 2724680bceee ("neigh: Keep neighbour
cache entries if number of them is small enough."), since all neighbour cache
entries in the NUD_STALE state will be kept in the neighbour table as long as
the number of cache entries does not exceed the value specified in gc_thresh1.

This commit validates the state of a neighbour cache entry before using
the entry.

Signed-off-by: JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
Reviewed-by: JinLin Chen <jlchen@...ology.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index b1b5e85..ed683e5 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_
 		struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
 		int ret;
 
-		if (neigh->hh.hh_len) {
+		if ((neigh->nud_state & NUD_CONNECTED) && neigh->hh.hh_len) {
 			neigh_hh_bridge(&neigh->hh, skb);
 			skb->dev = nf_bridge->physindev;
 			ret = br_handle_frame_finish(net, sk, skb);
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ