[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190107.091031.100384065611982323.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 09:10:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kchen@...ology.com
Cc: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: bridge: fix a bug on using a neighbour cache
entry without checking its state
From: kchen <kchen@...ology.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2019 11:28:13 +0800
> From: JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
>
> When handling DNAT'ed packets on a bridge device, the neighbour cache entry
> from lookup was used without checking its state. It means that a cache entry
> in the NUD_STALE state will be used directly instead of entering the NUD_DELAY
> state to confirm the reachability of the neighbor.
>
> This problem becomes worse after commit 2724680bceee ("neigh: Keep neighbour
> cache entries if number of them is small enough."), since all neighbour cache
> entries in the NUD_STALE state will be kept in the neighbour table as long as
> the number of cache entries does not exceed the value specified in gc_thresh1.
>
> This commit validates the state of a neighbour cache entry before using
> the entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: JianJhen Chen <kchen@...ology.com>
> Reviewed-by: JinLin Chen <jlchen@...ology.com>
Indeed, this looks correct.
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists