[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg02_--Xbf9HQw0g5-0k_uY+ksbxfBHK45BKDnPjz9OXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 09:43:41 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"dvlasenk@...hat.com" <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"brgerst@...il.com" <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: only use ERMS for user copies for larger sizes
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:55 AM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>
> I needed to open-code one part because it wants to do copy_to_user()
> from a PCIe address buffer (which has to work).
It will never work for memcpy_fromio(). Any driver that thinks it will
copy from io space to user space absolutely *has* to do it by hand. No
questions, and no exceptions. Some loop like
for (..)
put_user(readl(iomem++), uaddr++);
because neither copy_to_user() nor memcpy_fromio() will *ever* handle
that correctly.
They might randomly happen to work on x86, but absolutely nowhere else.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists