[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i60n1Fp0dJ5kbHgpKuB+Www3ZCOX2GuLnzzhpGCZ1jMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:52:05 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)"
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] ata: pata_acpi: Make PCI dependency explicit
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:42 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 1/7/19 7:17 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > On 01/07/2019 12:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 7:11 PM Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> >>> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> >>> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> >>> specified directly. PATA_ACPI is a PCI device driver but the PCI
> >>> dependency has not been explicitly called out.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> >>> index 4ca7a6b4eaae..8218db17ebdb 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ comment "Generic fallback / legacy drivers"
> >>>
> >>> config PATA_ACPI
> >>> tristate "ACPI firmware driver for PATA"
> >>> - depends on ATA_ACPI && ATA_BMDMA
> >>> + depends on ATA_ACPI && ATA_BMDMA && PCI
> >>> help
> >>> This option enables an ACPI method driver which drives
> >>> motherboard PATA controller interfaces through the ACPI
> >>> --
> >>
> >> Any objections against this one from anyone?
> >
> > Patch looks correct to me (pata_acpi is indeed a PCI driver):
> >
> > Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> >
> > but it is best to wait for Jens' ACK if you want to merge it
> > through ACPI tree..
>
> You can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>
> if you want to merge it through the ACPI tree.
I will do that, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists