linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/9] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190109092406.clpx57gmmtrj2vf4@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jan 2019 14:54:06 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     andy.gross@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, collinsd@...eaurora.org, mka@...omium.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, henryc.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/9] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings

On 09-01-19, 14:50, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Sure, does this seem fine?
> 
> - opp-level: A value representing the performance level of the device,
>   expressed as a 32-bit big-endian integer.

Not sure if you need to specify endian-ness here.

> I assume the changelog mentioning the motivation behind adding this is fine?

Yeah, that would be fine. Just mention that one of the users of such a
property is qcom/mtk ......

-- 
viresh