lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:52:00 -0800
From:   Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] kernel: release ptraced tasks before zap_pid_ns_processes

Currently, exit_ptrace() adds all ptraced tasks in a dead list, than
zap_pid_ns_processes() waits all tasks in a current pidns, and only
then tasks from the dead list are released.

zap_pid_ns_processes() can stuck on waiting tasks from the dead list. In
this case, we will have one unkillable process with one or more dead
children.

Thanks to Oleg for the advice to release tasks in find_child_reaper().

Fixes: 7c8bd2322c7f ("exit: ptrace: shift "reap dead" code from exit_ptrace() to forget_original_parent()")

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
---

v2: Oleg showed that ptraced tasks can be released in
find_child_reaper(). This allows to avoid additional
write_lock/unlock(tasklist), and another list_for_each_entry_safe(dead)
loop is called only if it is actually needed.

 kernel/exit.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 2d14979577ee..5df787a497f5 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -558,12 +558,14 @@ static struct task_struct *find_alive_thread(struct task_struct *p)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
+static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father,
+						struct list_head *dead)
 	__releases(&tasklist_lock)
 	__acquires(&tasklist_lock)
 {
 	struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(father);
 	struct task_struct *reaper = pid_ns->child_reaper;
+	struct task_struct *p, *n;
 
 	if (likely(reaper != father))
 		return reaper;
@@ -579,6 +581,12 @@ static struct task_struct *find_child_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
 		panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n",
 			father->signal->group_exit_code ?: father->exit_code);
 	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, dead, ptrace_entry) {
+		list_del_init(&p->ptrace_entry);
+		release_task(p);
+	}
+
 	zap_pid_ns_processes(pid_ns);
 	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
@@ -668,7 +676,7 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struct task_struct *father,
 		exit_ptrace(father, dead);
 
 	/* Can drop and reacquire tasklist_lock */
-	reaper = find_child_reaper(father);
+	reaper = find_child_reaper(father, dead);
 	if (list_empty(&father->children))
 		return;
 
-- 
2.17.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ