[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f7b1fb9-260a-93aa-ec88-8d48ca9b2513@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:10:53 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/41] scsi: csiostor: csio_wr: mark expected switch
fall-through
Hi,
Friendly ping (second one):
Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?
Martin: apparently, the only maintainers for
this driver are you and James.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 12/19/18 9:39 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping:
>
> Who can ack or review this patch, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 11/27/18 10:28 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056538 ("Missing break in switch")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c
>> index dc12933533d5..b6861ea66c9f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_wr.c
>> @@ -808,6 +808,7 @@ csio_wr_destroy_queues(struct csio_hw *hw, bool cmd)
>> csio_q_eqid(hw, i) = CSIO_MAX_QID;
>> }
>> + /* fall through */
>> case CSIO_INGRESS:
>> if (csio_q_iqid(hw, i) != CSIO_MAX_QID) {
>> csio_wr_cleanup_iq_ftr(hw, i);
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists