linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:12:07 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Anil Gurumurthy <anil.gurumurthy@...gic.com>,
        Sudarsana Kalluru <sudarsana.kalluru@...gic.com>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch
 fall-throughs

Hi,

Friendly ping (second one):

Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 12/19/18 9:39 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Friendly ping:
> 
> Who can ack or review this patch, please?
> 
> Thanks
> -- 
> Gustavo
> 
> On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that I replaced "!! fall through !!" and "!!! fall through !!!"
>> comments with "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is
>> expecting to find.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744899 ("Missing break in switch")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744900 ("Missing break in switch")
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744901 ("Missing break in switch")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c | 19 +++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c
>> index de50349a39ce..1e400f2aaece 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcs_rport.c
>> @@ -427,17 +427,13 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_plogi(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport, enum rport_event event)
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
>>           bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
>> -        /*
>> -         * !! fall through !!
>> -         */
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
>>           if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
>>               bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
>>           bfa_fcxp_discard(rport->fcxp);
>> -        /*
>> -         * !! fall through !!
>> -         */
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_FAILED:
>>           if (rport->plogi_retries < BFA_FCS_RPORT_MAX_RETRIES) {
>>               rport->plogi_retries++;
>> @@ -868,9 +864,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_adisc_online(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport,
>>            * At least go offline when a PLOGI is received.
>>            */
>>           bfa_fcxp_discard(rport->fcxp);
>> -        /*
>> -         * !!! fall through !!!
>> -         */
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_FAILED:
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_ADDRESS_CHANGE:
>> @@ -1056,6 +1050,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_fc4_logosend(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport,
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
>>           bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
>>           if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
>>               bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
>> @@ -1144,9 +1139,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_hcb_offline(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport,
>>               bfa_fcs_rport_send_plogiacc(rport, NULL);
>>               break;
>>           }
>> -        /*
>> -         * !! fall through !!
>> -         */
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_ADDRESS_CHANGE:
>>           if (!bfa_fcs_lport_is_online(rport->port)) {
>> @@ -1303,6 +1296,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_hcb_logosend(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport,
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
>>           bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
>>           if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
>>               bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
>> @@ -1346,6 +1340,7 @@ bfa_fcs_rport_sm_logo_sending(struct bfa_fcs_rport_s *rport,
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_LOGO_RCVD:
>>           bfa_fcs_rport_send_logo_acc(rport);
>> +        /* fall through */
>>       case RPSM_EVENT_PRLO_RCVD:
>>           if (rport->prlo == BFA_TRUE)
>>               bfa_fcs_rport_send_prlo_acc(rport);
>>