[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1c70e7c-5936-a094-7487-8b18318e6257@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 08:42:23 +0100
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/41] scsi: aic7xxx: aic79xx: mark expected switch
fall-through
On 1/10/19 9:15 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Friendly ping (second one):
>
> Who can ack/review/take this patch, please?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On 12/19/18 9:36 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Friendly ping:
>>
>> Who can ack or review this patch, please?
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Gustavo
>>
>> On 11/27/18 10:26 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>>
>>> Notice that, in some cases, I replaced "FALLTHROUGH" with a "fall
>>> through"
>>> annotation and then placed it at the bottom of the corresponding switch
>>> case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>>>
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114961 ("Missing break in switch")
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114962 ("Missing break in switch")
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114963 ("Missing break in switch")
>>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114964 ("Missing break in switch")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic79xx_core.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
Sorry, I thought I'd done so already.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@...e.com +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists