linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 36/41] scsi: qla4xxx: ql4_os: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1tviey6ij.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:05:56 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        "Dept-Eng QLogic Storage Upstream" 
        <QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...ium.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/41] scsi: qla4xxx: ql4_os: mark expected switch fall-through


Nilesh,

>>In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>>where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>>Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "allow fall-through"
>>with a "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to
>>find.

Applied to 5.1/scsi-queue. Thanks, Gustavo.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering