[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdacXeBEh2UMmigSo+zYQCj3yMyNRfxHjqhu_kiZ2JMXbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:19:26 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix line event timestamps for nested irqs
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 11:32 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Nested interrupts run inside the calling thread's context and the top
> half handler is never called which means that we never read the
> timestamp.
>
> This issue came up when trying to read line events from a gpiochip
> using regmap_irq_chip for interrupts.
>
> Fix it by reading the timestamp from the irq thread function if it's
> still 0 by the time the second handler is called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Oh that's right. Should this not have Fixes: and Cc: stable?
> + /*
> + * We may be running from a nested threaded interrupt in which case
> + * we didn't get the timestamp from lineevent_irq_handler().
> + */
> + if (!le->timestamp)
> + le->timestamp = ktime_get_real_ns();
> +
> ge.timestamp = le->timestamp;
I would merge these:
if (!le->timestamp)
ge.timestamp = ktime_get_real_ns();
else
ge.timestamp = le->timestamp;
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists