[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <428430f50bc5bf51663736139541b1994cc37b6e.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:40:15 +0000
From: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rohit kumar <rohitkr@...eaurora.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: rohkumar@....qualcomm.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
bgoswami@...eaurora.org, vinod.koul@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plai@...eaurora.org, tiwai@...e.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, asishb@...eaurora.org,
Ajit Pandey <ajitp@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Fix null pointer
dereference in soc_find_component
On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 11:37 +0530, Rohit kumar wrote:
> On 1/12/2019 3:19 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > Thanks for the overnight fix. This update fixes the issue on my
> > > Skylake XPS13 test device (blind testing since I don't understand
> > > what the code does).
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > I need to take this back, this set of changes (initial+fix) causes an
> > error with our HDMI support
> >
> > [ 17.437684] sof-audio sof-audio: created machine bxt-pcm512x
> > [ 17.585279] bxt-pcm512x bxt-pcm512x: ASoC: failed to init link iDisp1
> > [ 17.585639] bxt-pcm512x bxt-pcm512x: snd_soc_register_card failed -517
> >
> > Removing your changes restores the functionality
> >
> Looks like we should revert generic implementation for defering probe
> and move to call from machine driver as done in v1.
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1027560/
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1027561/
>
> @Mark, Do you have suggestion to refine current patch?
> > Adding some traces I can see that the the platform name we use doesn't
> > seem compatible with your logic. All the Intel boards used a constant
> > platform name matching the PCI ID, see e.g. [1], which IIRC is used to
> > bind components. Liam, do you recall in more details if this is really
> > required?
Sorry, I cant quite remember why the PCI ID was used for the platform name, I
think it started with the SKL generation as previous generations used "baytrail-
pcm" and "haswell-pcm" as platform names IIRC. Perhaps Vinod will know.
The platform name is only used by SOF when over writing the "legacy" platform
name e.g. "baytrail-pcm" would become "sof-audio" and this is only used for
binding DAI links (so that all legacy machine drivers can be reused without
modification).
Liam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists